Both sides of the aisle agree: The U.S. women’s soccer team should be paid as much as the men

The tipping level can have been the 6th target. Or the 7th. Or the 13th, which became out to be the remaining target scored within the U.S. girls’s nationwide crew’s at hand defeat of Thailand of their first Global Cup recreation.

Whichever target it was once that lovers concept must were the remaining for ecstatic celebration by the likes of Megan Rapinoe and Alex Morgan on Tuesday, the debate over the players’ sliding, kicking and group hugging drew attention to another issue: the 38 cents on the dollar that the women are paid compared to the men’s team.

On International Women’s Day in March, all 28 members of the women’s team filed a class-action gender discrimination lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation, alleging they do the same job as the men’s team in exchange for lower wages and inferior working conditions. The men’s national team has never won a world title and did not qualify for last year’s World Cup.

The women have been fighting for fair pay for years. Five of them filed a wage-discrimination complaint in 2016 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency that enforces civil-rights laws in the workplace. Some of them then made the rounds on major television networks to plead their case.

As Washington Post columnist Sally Jenkins wrote, the women’s performance on Tuesday is likely only to make it harder for U.S. Soccer to keep defending its current pay structure:

Just imagine how that record-setting 13-0 victory over Thailand will play at a jury trial. It’s going to be a lot of fun watching lawyers for the soccer federation try to justify why the U.S. Women’s National Team, with their air rifles for legs, are paid 38 cents on the dollar compared to their male counterparts and had to sue for fair wages. It’s going to be pure entertainment listening to federation president Carlos Cordeiro stammer out an explanation on the witness stand of why this team, which is nothing short of an American damn treasure, isn’t worth equal coin to a men’s squad that can’t beat Jamaica.

With attention turned to the women’s achievements, politicians, athletes, writers and others weighed in on the pay gap. Defenders of the difference pointed to the significantly higher revenue generated by the men’s World Cup, compared with the women’s event.

The 2010 men’s World Cup brought in about $4 billion, CBS reported, while the women’s World Cup in 2011 earned about $73 million. The men’s players got 9 percent of their event’s total revenue, while the women’s team got 13 percent of theirs, according to CBS.

Other celebrities and public figures — including White House counselor Kellyanne Conway — expressed frustration with the gender pay gap, arguing that the women’s performance makes them worthy of at least as much money as the men:

Learn extra:

Did USWNT gamers rejoice their targets with an excessive amount of gusto? Global Cup rout sparks debate.

Ladies’s Global Cup effects, time table and standings

For Thailand girls’s football crew, 13 targets by means of U.S. are simply rising pains

U.S. girls’s football is relentless — and unapologetic — in Global Cup-record rout of Thailand

The U.S. girls’s unreal 13-goal Global Cup win, by means of the numbers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *