Names of 11 clergy shielded from grand jury report on sex abuse in Catholic church

The clergymen went to court docket to problem being named within the file ahead of it used to be made public in August.

They argued they’d now not been supplied an ok alternative to answer the allegations in opposition to them to the grand jury, describing the record in a court docket temporary as containing “false, deceptive, wrong and unsupported assertions.”

“We are simply gratified that the court docket undertook a considerable effort to vindicate a core Pennsylvania constitutional proper, and procedural safeguards to be sure that that proper is commemorated sooner or later,” legal professional Chris Corridor, who represents one of the most petitioners, stated Monday.

Efrem Grail, some other legal professional with shoppers who challenged disclosure, stated he used to be gratified by way of the ruling.

“Its opinion obviously demonstrates the constitutional inadequacy of the commonwealth’s Investigating Grand Jury Act for the injustice of its procedures,” Grail stated.

The grand jury discovered loads of clergymen had abused youngsters over the prior 70 years, describing abuse that incorporated violent sexual assaults. The record, which used to be issued with intensive redactions whilst the clergymen’ prison problem used to be pending, additionally stated church officers lined up the abuse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *